We will be talking in this speech about two people that fought for a better future and a better day in our world.It is important to say that while we talk the text will centralize in the why Is Che Guevara stronger with wis words than Ronald Reagan because of the way they are going and the emoitios that Che releases when he tries to encourage youth for the creation of a future.While we get to the very nucleus of the speeches, we will be able to proof that this arguments are real, and as they become deeper, the purpose of each of them are going to be clearer to the reader. When reading both speeches a person can sinply see that Che Guevara has his ideas all clear and his words already in his mind, but when we see Ronald Reagan, he soeaks the same words for a not strong impact, an that is the reason one is better speaker than the other.

Ronald Reagan was a person who searched for peace and equality, as well he was constantly speaking of statistics in the time and always making reference to what  other people that remarked history said, basically he, on his text, speaks of the present situation in the country and in certain way the world, but as he talks we can say that he gives a great number of examples, which is not bad but misses the point by trying to make it more clear for the people listening, he gives us a perspective very acceptable of the “today” and makes us notice what our problems are, and that is why he made his way through history; But as we compare and contrast his statistical worlds and his reflection of a world that is burning, Che Guevara makes reference to what in the nowadays world  is more important, the youth, he does not searches for problems and wrong spots in the time line that we have drew, he passes that point and wants to wake up young people that at the end of the day will make the tomorrow, while Ronald Reagan says-“federal employees number two and a half million; and federal, state, and local, one out of six of the nation's work force employed by government. These proliferating bureaus with their thousands of regulations have cost us many of our constitutional safeguards. How many of us realize that today federal agents can invade a man's property without a warrant...”- Che Guevara says-” Ustedes, compañeros, deben ser la vanguardia de todos los movimientos, los primeros en estar dispuestos para los sacrificios que la Revolución demande, cualquiera que sea la índole de estos sacrificios; los primeros en el trabajo, los primeros en el estudio, los primeros en la defensa del país”, this can show us that he makes reference to the things that in theory matter the most, because at the end of the day, ¿who’s going to look for the world?, in can’t be the same people that caused it, it is not something we can trust our future on, he shares with us the idea of a world of new ideas and a world that has a last chance to advance, this all comes with the youth, as he talks he gives us some kind of guilt, which is good, because that is the only thing that makes us to wake up, he goes straight to the point and does not gives importance to what misses the point, when he let the words get out of his mouth he talks only what has to be spoken.

On his text Ronald Reagan has a lot of logical points, because he wants to make reference to what has not being unmasked to the society, he gives the number and the situations in which his points take place, this character affirms the data with things that support those, but his does not makes a total reference to the solutions, he says them, but he keeps missing the point.

On the other side, Che G. is directly going to the solution, not directing his ideas to the problems that everybody already knows, basing on small statements, he brings out all the development of this ones.

This type of speech has a greater impact on the world, why? Because he says exactly what people don’t want to hear and this works because he is not trying to make people feel good, he is trying to make them concentrate and make sure that whatever they do, they have to make it so for the young people there can be a clearer path on the vision of a new day. On is speech Ronald Reagan has another concept, this concept bases the point in that if I show them what is generating all the stuff they are doing then I can make them make a reflection and change, but what he is doing is giving the data that almost all the people knows and is not ashamed to know, by only reading the first paragraphs of this speech you can say that is very convincing and that it can make a great impact, but as you keep reading you notice that he is telling and telling the same things but in different words.

As there is a lot of contrast in the speeches, we can say that there are some similarities. Firstly you and feel the essence of change on their words, they both want to make people wake up and start evolving the ideas of a new world, the constantly say in their own words that they are tired and angry to see the world getting more rotten and los, that’s the basic purpose of the speeches, make a difference and act on the moment until it is too late, and that is why they are very famous and a great part of the society ideas because they make us notice what we have not seen clearly.

Also they are giving a certain number of emotional points, so people can really feel the pain that the entire world is suffering, and a sickness they and only they have to heal, when they talk on an emotional way, they do it moderately, just the amount is needed, this is important because if they miss the point making people cry they would have spoken for nothing, because the people will not do a thing for the problems.

Basically they are doing what they are for and they are not going to surrender until there is something done, I would rather say that maybe they are really different and have been working in different types of environment, but they have the same and unique idea that they can make at the end of the day, a diference

One day when the glory comes It will be ours, it will be ours One day when the war is won We will be sure, we will be sure Oh glory

There are many ways and many options, but the problem is not neither the solutions or the alternatives, only the question, What are you willing to do?